Helping Companies Rethink, Recover & Refocus on the Future

Most leaders claim they want A-players. They talk about excellence, high standards, and building great teams. Yet when you look closely at their hiring decisions, the pattern tells a different story. The strongest candidates are passed over. The safest ones get the offer. Over time, average teams stay average.

This isn’t a talent pipeline problem. It isn’t a compensation issue. And it isn’t a lack of candidates.

It’s a psychology problem.

Hiring exceptional people forces leaders to confront something deeply personal: their own identity. And for many B and C level leaders, that moment creates more internal resistance than they realize.

What follows are the most common psychological blind spots that quietly shape hiring decisions, even among well-intentioned leaders.

Hiring Is an Identity Decision Before It’s a Business Decision

Leadership roles often become tightly woven into a person’s sense of self. Authority, expertise, and decision rights aren’t just responsibilities. They are signals of worth.

When a genuinely high performer enters the hiring process, that identity can feel subtly threatened. Not consciously. Not dramatically. But internally, something shifts.

Instead of excitement, there is tension.
Instead of curiosity, there is caution.

The brain interprets this discomfort as risk and quickly looks for rational explanations. That’s how phrases like “not the right fit” or “might be hard to manage” begin to surface.

These explanations feel reasonable, but they often serve a psychological purpose: protecting the leader’s sense of competence and control.

Ego Threat and the Need to Feel Competent

Self-determination theory explains that humans are driven by a need for ...

Finish Reading Why Average Leaders Struggle